Annual Report 2013
The state of the world's human rights

7 December 2007

Guantánamo detentions set for legal showdown

Guantánamo detentions set for legal showdown
The US Supreme Court has begun considering whether Guantánamo detainees should have access to the courts to contest their detention.

Lawyers acting for the detainees are arguing that those held in Guantánamo should have the right to habeas corpus: the mechanism that allows detainees to challenge the lawfulness of their detention in an independent and impartial court - and to be released if the detention is found to be unlawful.  Many organizations and individuals, including Amnesty International, have filed briefs in the Supreme Court in support of ensuring habeas corpus for the detainees.

The US authorities say the 2006 Military Commissions Act stripped the courts of the power to consider habeas corpus petitions from foreign nationals held as so-called "enemy combatants".

They also argue that the alternative system the government has established – narrow judicial review of military determinations of “enemy combatant” status – is an adequate substitute for habeas corpus. Amnesty International strongly disagrees, as this system does not fix the flaws of the military review; which is not independent, where the detainee has no lawyer and which can rely on information coerced under torture.

With the US courts effectively removed from their role as an independent check on "war on terror" detentions, the past six years have seen detainees subjected to enforced disappearance, unlawful transfer, torture and other abuses.

The ‘rights-free’ zone that the USA has attempted to create at Guantánamo Bay cries out for full judicial scrutiny. The administration chose the location to hold foreign detainees in the "war on terror" because it believed they would not be able to challenge their detention via habeas corpus petitions filed in the US courts.

The Supreme Court ruled against the government in two earlier Guantánamo cases, decided in 2004 and 2006.  However, the administration interpreted these rulings narrowly and Congress passed legislation – the Detainee Treatment Act in 2005 and the Military Commissions Act – that sought to obliterate habeas corpus for these detainees and to provide only limited judicial review.  

Habeas corpus reflects a fundamental principle of international law. This is a crucial moment for human rights and the rule of law. The Supreme Court is expected to issue its judgment by mid-2008.

Read More

No substitute for habeas corpus - Six years without judicial review in Guantánamo (Report, 1 November 2007)


Torture And Ill-treatment 






Security with Human Rights 

@amnestyonline on twitter


11 July 2014

Refugees in Nairobi are appealing against a controversial ruling that would force thousands of Somalis from their homes to live in squalid overcrowded camps in north Kenya.

Read more »
19 June 2014

Chile’s commitment to decriminalize abortion in cases where the pregnancy was the result of rape, the woman’s life is in danger and when the foetus is not viable is a positive... Read more »

10 July 2014

The sentencing of five media workers in Myanmar each to 10 years’ imprisonment with hard labour for “disclosing state secrets” makes today a dark day for freedom of expression... Read more »

11 July 2014

Amnesty International has gathered graphic and compelling evidence of savage beatings and other torture meted out against activists, protesters and journalists in eastern... Read more »

08 July 2014

Amnesty International is calling on the Israeli authorities and Palestinian armed groups in Gaza, including the military wing of Hamas, to ensure that civilian lives are... Read more »