Documento - India: Las autoridades deben actuar ante las conclusiones de una investigación oficial sobre los proyectos de Vedanta en Orissa
AMNESTY
INTERNATIONAL
PUBLIC STATEMENT
ASA 20/007/2010
15 March 2010
India: Authorities must act on vital findings of
official probe into Vedanta’s projects in Orissa
Indian authorities must act on vital findings of an official team
into abuses of human rights and violations of forest laws by
Vedanta Resources’ companies in their bauxite mining and alumina
refinery projects in Orissa, Amnesty International said today.
The findings of the official three-member team, released by India's
Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) on 12 March 2010,
document various human rights violations of
adivasi(Indigenous people) communities and violations of
forest laws in relation to the Vedanta’s refinery and planned
mining project.
Describing the probe findings as a “welcome first step”, Amnesty
International said these echoed the conclusions of the
organization’s report, Don’t Mine us out of Existence: Bauxite
Mine and Refinery Devastate Lives in India, released in New
Delhi last month. The full report can be viewed on Amnesty
International’s website at
http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA20/001/2010/en.
The findings of the official team highlight the absence of any
studies on the impact of the mining on the Dongria Kondh adivasi
community which inhabit the Niyamgiri hills. One of the three
reports submitted by the team observes that “(the) disruption of
the habitat and the way of life of this PTG [Primitive Tribal
Group] cannot be remediated nor compensated, and may lead to the
destruction of the Dongria Kondh as a PTG.” It also concludes that
the State authorities never established any process to seek the
informed consent of the Dongria Kondh for the bauxite mining
project nor ensured their rights guaranteed as per India’s forest
laws.
Amnesty International points out that, under international law,
Indian authorities are obliged to respect, protect and fulfil the
rights of indigenous peoples over the lands and territories they
traditionally occupy. The obligation to protect requires measures
by states to ensure that other actors, such as companies, do not
abuse or infringe human rights.
Members of the official team, who visited two of the eight villages
close to the alumina refinery at nearby Lanjigarh, have also
documented abuses suffered by local communities including
violations of the rights to water, health and healthy environment
and loss of livelihoods.
MoEF Minister Jairam Ramesh has promised follow-up action on the
probe findings. Any such follow-up action must also include full
consultation with local communities on the refinery expansion and
mining proposal, including setting up of a process to seek the
free, prior and informed consent of the Dongria Kondh, and respect
their decision, Amnesty International said.
Amnesty International reiterates its demand that until the existing
problems are resolved, the Governments of India and Orissa and
Vedanta Resources should ensure that there is no expansion of the
refinery and mining does not go ahead.
Background
The mining in Niyamgiri is to be carried out by a subsidiary of
Vedanta Resources, a UK-based FTSE 100 company, and the Orissa
government-owned Orissa Mining Corporation (OMC). The refinery at
Lanjigarh is operated by Vedanta Aluminium Limited, another
subsidiary of Vedanta Resources.
Following mounting protests from local communities and allegations of human rights abuses, the MoEF, in December last, constituted the three-member official team – consisting of a forestry official, a former government wildlife official and an independent legal expert – to visit the area. On 12 March 2010, the Ministry’s Forest Advisory Committee deliberated on the three reports submitted by the team and asked the Orissa government to provide an explanation for the violations.
Although Vedanta Resources and the Orissa government have denied claims of violation of human rights, a number of investors including the Church of England have sold their shares in Vedanta's Resources after concluding that Vedanta did not show respect for human rights of local communities.
ENDS