Informe anual 2012
El estado de los derechos humanos en el mundo

Documento - Saudi Arabia: Further information: Elderly woman and two men face flogging



Further information on UA: 71/09 Index: MDE 23/034/2009 Saudi Arabia Date: 12 November 2009


URGENT ACTION

ELDERLY WOMAN AND TWO MEN FACE FLOGGING

Khamisa Mohammed Sawadi, a 75-year-old Syrian woman, along with two younger Saudi Arabian men known only as Fahad, aged 24, and Hadyan, have had their sentences of flogging and imprisonment reimposed and confirmed on appeal after the Court of Cassation in Saudi Arabia sent the case back for retrial to the lower court which first heard it. If the recently established Supreme Court upholds their sentences, they will be imprisoned and at imminent risk of flogging.

On 25 August a court in al-Shamli, north of the capital Riyadh, reimposed sentences it had originally handed down on 3 March 2009 against Khamisa Mohammed Sawadi, Fahad and Hadyan; Khamisa and Fahad were again sentenced to 40 lashes and four months’ imprisonment, and Hadyan to 60 lashes and six months’ imprisonment. Khamisa Mohammed Sawadi was also sentenced to be returned to her native country Syria on completion of her prison term. They had all been found guilty of khilwa(being in the company of members of the opposite sex who are not close relatives). An appeal court in Riyadh has since confirmed this decision, which, according to their lawyer, is now before the Supreme Court for a final review. If they are detained following the Supreme Court’s decision, they would be prisoners of conscience as Amnesty International considers imprisonment on grounds of khilwato be a violation of their internationally recognized rights to freedom of expression and to privacy.

Khamisa Mohammed Sawadi, Fahad and Hadyan were arrested on 21 April 2008 by members of the Commission for Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice (also known as the Mutawa’een or religious police). At their first trial, Fahad and Hadyan stated in their defence that they were delivering bread to Khamisa Mohammed Sawadi. Fahad argued that the offence of khilwadid not apply on the basis that he was related to Khamisa Mohammed Sawadi, who breastfed him when he was a child. The court, however, rejected this argument.

PLEASE WRITE IMMEDIATELY in Arabic, English or your own language:

- Urging the authorities to drop the charge of khilwa against Khamisa Mohammed Sawadi, Fahad and Hadyan as it violates their rights to freedom of expression and to privacy;

- Noting that, if the three are imprisoned following the Supreme Court’s review, Amnesty International would consider them to be prisoners of conscience and call for their immediate and unconditional release;

- Calling on the authorities not to flog the three, as flogging is in violation of Saudi Arabia’s obligations under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, to which Saudi Arabia is a state party.


PLEASE SEND APPEALS BEFORE 24 DECEMBER 2009 TO:

King and Prime Minister

His Majesty King ‘Abdullah Bin ‘Abdul ‘Aziz Al-Saud

The Custodian of the two Holy Mosques

Office of His Majesty the King

Royal Court, Riyadh

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Fax: (via Ministry of the Interior)

+966 1 403 1185 (please keep trying)

Salutation: Your Majesty

Second Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior

His Royal Highness Prince Naif bin ‘Abdul ‘Aziz Al-Saud, Ministry of the Interior, P.O. Box 2933, Airport Road

Riyadh 11134

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Fax: +966 1 403 1185 (please keep trying)

Salutation: Your Royal Highness

And copies to:

President, Human Rights Commission

Mr Bandar Mohammed ‘Abdullah al- Aiban

Human Rights Commission

P.O. Box 58889, King Fahad Road, Building No. 373, Riyadh 11515

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Fax: +966 1 461 2061

Email: hrc@haq-ksa.org


Also send copies to diplomatic representatives accredited to your country. Please check with your section office if sending appeals after the above date. This is the second update of UA 71/09 (MDE 23/005/2009). Further information: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/MDE23/005/2009/en and http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/MDE23/015/2009/en

URGENT ACTION

ELDERLY WOMAN AND TWO MEN FACE FLOGGING

ADditional Information

The Supreme Court began to function in February 2009 as the final court of appeal. This is part of a new court system introduced by the 2007 Law of the Judiciary. The Court of Cassation, which acted as an appellate body, has now been replaced by courts of appeal. For more information regarding the judicial reforms, please see Saudi Arabia: Affront to Justice: Death Penalty in Saudi Arabia (Index: MDE 23/027/2008), 14 October 2008: http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/report/saudi-arabia-executions-target-foreign-nationals-20081014


Flogging is mandatory in Saudi Arabia for a number of offences and can also be used at the discretion of judges as an alternative or in addition to other punishments. Sentences can range from dozens to thousands of lashes, and are usually carried out in instalments, at intervals ranging from two weeks to one month. The highest number of lashes imposed in a single case recorded by Amnesty International was 40,000 lashes. They were imposed this year in a case of a defendant tried on murder charges.


The use of corporal punishments such as flogging violates the absolute prohibition against torture and other cruel, inhuman and or degrading treatment or punishment set out in Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”, as well as Saudi Arabia’s obligations under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, to which it is a state party. The UN Special Rapporteur on Torture has stated that “corporal punishment is inconsistent with the prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”


Amnesty International considers the criminalization of khilwa to be a violation of the right to freedom of expression and to privacy as set out in international human rights standards. In particular, it violates an individual’s right to freedom from arbitrary interference with their privacy and family, as set out in Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and their right to freedom of expression, as set out in Article 19.


Further information on UA: 71/09 Index: MDE 23/034/2009 Issue Date: 12 November 2009

Cómo puedes ayudar

AMNISTÍA INTERNACIONAL EN EL MUNDO